Showing posts with label WWII. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WWII. Show all posts

Friday, November 01, 2013

The Book Thief




directed by Brian Percival (2013)

This was a really well made adaptation of the award winning novel by Markus Zusak. With the great performances and high production values in this WWII coming of age period piece, I wouldn't be surprised if it gets tons of nominations once the award season rolls around.  I enjoyed it while I watched it, and took pleasure in the ways the story was clever with the construction, making note of all its pointed writerly references. What's the title of the rescued banned book read to the Jew hiding in basement? The Invisible Man of course :)  Death as the narrator, voiced by Roger Allamhad some of the most poetic and beautiful lines.  And it's definitely got book loving as its hardcover core value, but its greatest strength is in terms of showing the development of a writerly personality.

The girl, played by Monsier Lazar's Sophie Nélisse, can't read, but she's got a brain and she works hard to learn with the help of her foster father - Geoffrey Rush in one of his sweetest roles ever.  He's not a bastard for a change!  He paints her an alphabet wall in the basement, where she can chalk the words she's learning in one of the best depictions of DIY dictionary use ever.  (The Color Purple and Nettie's homemade post it notes is another good one.) It's the foster mom that's the shrew with the hidden heart of gold that shoulders some of the antagonist work until the real bad guys show up. (Nazis in case you were wondering, duh.) And that stereotypical female role, with Emily Watson wielding the sharp tongue of the witchy wife, paired off with her sadsack husband, that leads me into the area of criticism.
The story is super sentimental with fairly shallow characterisations of most of the supporting roles, and it's trying to be profound, but I didn't buy its using a backdrop of genocide and fascism to dramatise a very personal story.

For starters, I didn't like how it had the mom being all megabitch.  Hohum for positive depictions of female power. But especially the fact that it was another case of whitewashing history is what irked me.

There's a heavy handed metaphorical moment where Mein Kampf gets it's inner pages painted out so the girl can put her words there.



Yes that's such a sweet idea eh?  And of course it's a humanist perspective too - a book of hateful ideology repurposed for creative use - but I also think it's a dangerous one.

It's analogous to the scene where the Nazis are burning the books they see as degenerate - the ideas which the regime figured were dangerous to their ideology.

But you can't and shouldn't try to erase or skew historical truth!  It's such a revisionist view of Nazi Germany too.  Very similar to Life is Beautiful, which I also found offensive in terms of presenting a false view of the reality of the horrors of Italian fascism.  By implication, we're supposed to believe that all those Germans were of the same mind as the protagonists, or that there were sooo many of them with their morals and ethics held hostage by their crazy leaders.  And while there's some truth to that on an individualistic level, for the most part it's a goddamn lie.  And that kind of lie is the most insidious of all, because it allows us to keep on accepting bullshit ideas and excuses for NOT behaving in human ways to one another.  It's the system man!  What can you do against an evil amorphous bureaucracy? Howl at Hitler in the safety of an echo chamber? shrug. The truth is we ARE the system; it's made up of all of us acting in concert in ways that exploit and dehumanize others.  We're all complicit in that we benefit from the suffering and exploitation of many many people.  Just one example: the people who made the technology we're using to read this are, at the very least wage slaves, if not actual slaves!

Yes, there are repressive regimes where it's dangerous to display your opposition, but I prefer stories that showcase the bravery of open resistance.  While I understand the fear that keeps people silent in the face of injustice,  I think it's sad and retro to make heroes of people hiding their beliefs under a bushel because of the hostility of the dominant culture.  Because really,  Silence = Death; the death of the opportunity for a dialectical process that leads to change, and in truth, actual death.  Othering, hatred and genocide didn't end with WWII eh?


The best thing you can take away from this flick is the importance of using your voice to speak out on anything that matters to you.  Just doing that creates space for others to do the same.




Sunday, February 05, 2012

Das Boot





directed by Wolfgang Petersen (1981)

This is the 4:33 director's cut, and holy shit but this is a long movie, already in the start I was thinking, well this scene is completely unnecessary.  I guess it's character development.  I'm thinking particularly of the debauchery at the officer's club.  Sailors gonna drink eh?  Especially with a 1 in 4 chance of coming out alive?  Jesus Christ those are bad odds.  I'd make sure and get my party on too.

Actually it's the 3:28 directors cut.  I was thinking near what seemed like was gonna be the climax, there's another 1:30 to go?  So I checked out the running times and there are FIVE different versions of the movie, ranging from 2:20 to a 6 hour miniseries.  The DVR recorded another show at the end of the movie, which is why I was all confuzzled.

  • 150 minutes (1981, 1982) Theatrical
  • 209 minutes (1981) unreleased
  • 300 minutes (1984, 1988) BBC mini-series
  • 293 minutes (2004) Das Boot: The Original Uncut Version
  • 208 minutes (1997, 2010) Director's Cut

It's refreshing seeing a military centred flick that isn't outright propaganda for the military.  This isn't jingoistic or glorifying of military life.  It looks rough and barbaric in the sub, with men living on top of each other.  They'd sure be close, everyone aware of how much they depend on one  another.  There's no every man for himself in a sub, they'd all die together, one fate.

Lothar G. Buchheim, the writer of the novel, was upset that the film sacrificed realism for action melodrama, also that it was too glorifying of the U-boat war heroes.  I think his book must have been very antiwar, since I felt it was condemning of the idiocy of armed conflict, but then I bring that attitude and belief along to every war flick I see.  I thought it was life affirming and moral to see a film that depicted the ugliness of wasted resources, manpower, all this effort exerted towards what?  Killing and death and destruction?  Madness!!!

The best part is when the Captain is saying I'm sorry to the journalist.  They're in a tight spot and things look grim.

Lt. Werner: Captain?
Captain: I'm sorry.
Lt. Werner: You think it's hopeless now?
Captain: It's been 15 hours. He'll never do it. I'm sorry.
Lt. Werner: They made us all train for this day. "To be fearless and proud and alone. To need no one, just sacrifice. All for the Fatherland." Oh God, all just empty words. It's not the way they said it was, is it? I just want someone to be with. The only thing I feel is afraid.

I enjoyed it, and I usually don't care much for war flicks, this one is exceptional though.  It's completely understandable how many awards it won.  And Jürgen Prochnow?!!  Whatta man, whatta man, what a mighty good man.  ;) 





My only complaint is very minor.  I didn't like the dubbed voice of the redheaded codesman.  He was all squashed and strangled sounding.  It might have added some to the funny though, since he's the comic relief, cracking wise with cynical aphorisms.  Incidentally, the movie was shot silent because the sub was so noisy.  They could have got anyone to do the voices.  I'm glad Prochnow did his English lines too.













Thursday, February 02, 2012

Redtails




directed by  Anthony Hemingway (2012)

George Lucas does Star Wars X-Wing dogfights in the original old school style going to the origin story of it all with the WWII Flying Aces or whatever the pilot dudes were called BITD.  It's about a company of black pilots, the Tuskagee Airmen, at least that's the angle for the making of this particular flick, so there's racism and patriotism and all that other WWII propaganda hoohaa brouhaha going on in this.

I caught the last half of it, got to see the dogfights and that was fine with me.  I missed most of the bonding and training, all the establishing of the stereotyped characters, the hero and the reckless rebel, the stoic Sargent, and all the baby faced boys toughening into REAL MEN TM.  I also missed most of the overcoming the honky ofay opposition to an all black pilot battalion.  I bet it was tedious, because the part I did see had enough corny dialogue to carry me through a few shitty movies.  It does have Terrence Howard going for it though. I saw him once in real life and he's so pretty I wouldn't have minded his character development scenes much at all.  There's a whole bunch of pretty men in this actually, but I only recognised a couple.  Cuba Gooding Jr.'s character with his jaunty cocked cap, reminded me of Hogan, from Hogan's Heroes.  Andre Royo, Bubbles from the Wire plays a mechanic and there were some white people I recognised too, like Byran Cranston from Breaking Bad.





It's a pretty crappy flick, about par for a propaganda war glamourising production in its plot, but it's got really shitty dialogue and the pacing is off. About the best thing going for it, is it's set in the only good war, with NAZI Germany enemy combatants to ruthlessly blow up and destroy.  That, and the pretty mens and planes.  Plus it's a black story so the racism issues are important, it's just a shame it's not done very well.  There was another movie made in 1995 based on the same story, called The Tuskagee Airmen, but I haven't seen it.  It's on youtube though.  Lawrence Fishburne?  John Lithgow?  Even has Cuba Gooding Jr. again.  Looks better than this one Holmes.











There's one thing I don't get about war movies.  How can you make such a terrible thing into something noble?  I mean really, war means killing ACTUAL people, destroying fathers and brothers and mothers and daughters and babies! and that's not even considering all the material destruction, like homes and roads and shops and offices and bridges and schools, museums libraries factories etc etc.  All that doesn't even count, because the enemy is less than and smashing them is the job.   What they want? What their grievances are? None of that even matters, because they are the dehumanised other.  It's ridiculous.